When is Ass-to-Mouth acceptable?

Prompted by a rare intellectual pub debate and the idiotic sequel to the masterful film - "Clerks", I am closer to being able to resolve the debate of whether the act of Ass-to-Mouth, is acceptable, and if so, under which circumstances.

For all you frigid chick's out there, and for the fuckerroos who still don't know what "tromboning" is (see next post), Ass-to-mouth is simply being sucked off after you've been in her ass.

The reason this bothers me is that, I was categorically told "You NEVER go Ass to Mouth!", by more than one person, each of whom I respect enough to produce a counter argument, even if what I should be doing is telling them to fuck off, and getting on with some Saturday afternoon Ass-to-mouth of my own.

So, I think we can establish that anal in itself is perfectly ok, in fact girls sometimes demand it. By the same token, spazzing in her mouth is also ok, as if you've been doing anything right, sooner or later she's gonna ask you to do it (unless she's a jizz-o-phobe, in which case you're never gonna have the asstomouth dilemma anyway).

Individually, therefore, both anal and finishing in her mouth are OK, so thats sorted. Now why wouldn't they be ok when done consecutively?

A bunch of forum monkeys have already had a fairly unsophisticated debate about this on secondcitizen.com and their poll results on A to M, are as follows:

- Ok 16%
- Not Ok 52%
- Only in the heat of passion 19%
- Only when dipped in pie 13%

What a bunch of arse! 52% feckin percent not in favour, is bollox for a start. What grates me about the rest is the 19% "Only in the heat of passion". For fucks sake, if I happen to be in a chicks ass, Its gonna be in the heat of passion, and not something I'm doing while watching the news or whatever bollox.
Dipped in pie, does open up new possibilities, so I'm in favour of that one, but its gotta be dipped in pie AFTER being in her ass, not BEFORE, that would just be sick.

Besided, this lot clearly don't know Jack, and this isn't a democracy, and I'm saying that Ass to Mouth is like bacon and eggs, they're fine on their own, but better together.

I mean rimming is supposed to be kinda ok, and thats the poor girl having a taste of your ass, rather than her own, which is clearly far more palatable in the first place anyway.

So its ok isn't it? Well, maybe not always.

Following this logic, if Ass to Mouth is ok, is Ass to Mouth to Pussy to Ass to Mouth, also ok? Hmmm, I think it just might be.

Medically speaking, her ass contains less bacteria than her mouth, which makes it hygenic as well as fun. Bonus.

I suppose the only time it ain't ok, is if there's a GI issue of sorts, e.g. the runs or similar, but in that case Ass isn't cool to start with, let alone Ass to Mouth.

BUT, You're all missing the fucking point.

At this point, I have to explain, that the title of the post isn't really a question, its fucking rhetorical ok!
Whichever dumbass even has the inclination of asking the question is someone you shouldn't even be thinking of tolerating.
Can you imagine, like there's a couple in a bedroom, and he's stuffing her ass, and suddenly they're both wondering "Is Ass to Mouth ok?", "What will the neighbours think?", "Maybe I should call mummy and ask her?"

Those two clearly should not be procreating in the first place, hence ass to mouth is fucking compulsory in their case.

ASS TO MOUTH IS OK. (Unless Ass isn't ok, but then Mouth still might be, which is always a bonus, so its win win, either way).

Jack